It’s that time again and Christmas displays are popping up in and on homes all around the world. As we watch retailers like Home Depot and Walmart reduce prices on LED light bulbs, the same is happening with LED Christmas lights. So, is it time to make the switch?
Depending on your tastes, LED lighting for Christmas holiday decorating can be a quick affair with a few strings of lights on your Christmas tree or can be a large artistic expression in light on your home like you’re Clark Griswold of National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation movie.
Let’s take a look at some of the facts.
LED lighting for the holidays is safer – they’re not hot to the touch, so they won’t start a fire, especially if lit for a long period of time. They’re sturdier and made of epoxy lenses rather than plastic or glass like traditional incandescents. They’re longer-lasting and could be in use 20 or even 40 years from now. And they use less energy (about 80 percent) so that you can connect more strings together in series without blowing a fuse (your’s and the lights).
You might remember the moment in Christmas Vacation when Clark Griswold turned on the Christmas lights on his home (decorated with 25,000 incandescent imported Italian twinkle lights) and caused a major power outage in the city of Chicago. While you might not take out your local power grid, you might be concerned with your electric bill if you tend to decorate like a Griswold. You may want to consider some information that the US Department of Energy put together information about energy requirements of Christmas lighting.
According to the DOE, it can cost up to $10 to light a six-foot tree, 12 hours a day for 40 days using large C-9 incandescent lights while incandescent mini-lights would cost about $2.72. LEDs on the other hand would cost 27 cents or 82 cents respectively to light that same tree for the same period of time. Over a decade, it could be quite costly to stick with incandescents. The DOE table is below.
Retailers are bringing more LED Christmas lights to consumers. According to a recent article in the Kansas City Star newspaper, Walmart dedicated half of its shelf space to LEDs. Costs are coming down from $5 for a string of 50 mini LED lights, down from $6.30 last year. In fact, Costco won’t sell incandescent Christmas lights in 2013. General Electric, selling holiday lights since 1903, anticipates that two out of every five strings of lights sold this year will be LEDs.
So, it may be time to ditch the old fashioned Christmas lights for some new LEDs. And for a laugh and some holiday cheer, watch Christmas Vacation or this clip from the movie where the Griswold’s incandescent Christmas lights take down the Chicago power grid.
US DOE Christmas Light Info
Estimated cost of electricity to light a six-foot tree for 12 hours a day for 40 days
|Incandescent C-9 lights||$10.00|
|LED C-9 lights||$0.27|
Estimated cost* of buying and operating lights for 10 holiday seasons
|Incandescent C-9 lights||$122.19|
|LED C-9 lights||$17.99|
*Assumes 50 C-9 bulbs and 200 mini-lights per tree, with electricity at $0.119 per kilowatt-hour (kWh) (AEO 2012 Residential Average). Prices of lights based on quoted prices for low volume purchases from major home improvement retailers. All costs have been discounted at an annual rate of 5.6%. Life span assumed to be three seasons (1,500 hours) for non-LED lights.
For Further Reading & Viewing
Kansas City Star, Christmas lights are going green, http://www.kansascity.com/2013/11/10/4612642/christmas-lights-are-going-green.html
Energy Manager Today, LEDs Lead the Way for Holiday Lights
National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation, Griswold Home Power Outage Clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inWKw8nqQlI
US DOE Info: http://energy.gov/energysaver/articles/led-lighting